The block confirmed at 3:47 AM Prague time. A wallet tied to the GTA 6 leak drama pushed a Solana SPL token into existence. CYBERLEEK. No website. No roadmap. No audit. Just a name, a narrative, and a contract that could drain liquidity faster than a Rockstar server wipe. Within hours, the market cap touched $25 million. Within a day, it bled out to $7 million. The hacker pulled $146K in Wrapped SOL and 15.4 million tokens as a little 'fee.' Converted to 125K SOL. Gone. This isn't a rug pull. This is a sprint where the finish line was the exit ramp, and the crowd cheered while holding the bag.
I've been watching this space since the 2017 ETC fork sprint. I've seen scams dressed as protocols, vaporware wearing the skin of legitimacy. But this one? This one stripped the pretense bare. No fake team photos. No whitepaper with mathematical formulas copied from a textbook. Just a hacker, a stolen trailer, and a token contract that said 'I own everything' in every line of code.
The question isn't whether CYBERLEEK was a scam. The question is why the market keeps sprinting into these traps, and what this tells us about the state of Solana's meme coin ecosystem, the regulatory crosshairs now aimed at event-driven tokens, and the brutal math of zero-sum games dressed as community movements.
Let's break this down like a chain split in real-time. Not with academic detachment, but with the urgency of someone who watched the order book burn while Twitter went nuclear.
THE HOOK: A HACKER, A TRAILER, AND A CONTRACT THAT LEAKED MORE THAN THE GAME
The GTA 6 leak was already chaos. Rockstar Games hit by a massive intrusion. Footage flooding X, Discord, Telegram. Take-Two Interactive scrambling to scrub the internet clean. Lawyers sharpening subpoenas. And then, in the middle of this digital wildfire, someone decided to do the most crypto thing possible: mint a token about it.
CYBERLEEK launched on Solana. Standard SPL. No bells. No whistles. The kind of contract you can copy-paste from a GitHub template in five minutes. The 'innovation' wasn't in the code. It was in the narrative. 'Buy the leak. Own the chaos.' That was the pitch. And people bought it.
Not just bought it. FOMO'd into it. The market cap hit $25 million at peak. That's not a rounding error. That's real money flowing into a contract controlled by an anonymous hacker who had already demonstrated a willingness to break into corporate systems for fun and profit.
Then the inevitable happened. The contract owner extracted. $146K in Wrapped SOL. 15.4 million tokens. Converted to 125K SOL. The price dropped 46% in 24 hours. From $0.0344 to $0.0097. The narrative collapsed faster than a leaked trailer gets DMCA'd.
And here's the part that should make every trader pause: this wasn't a sophisticated exploit. This was a basic, textbook 'insider with admin keys' extraction. The kind of thing that security auditors flag in their sleep. The kind of thing that makes traditional finance folks shake their heads and mutter 'I told you so.'
But the market didn't care. The market never cares until it's too late. Social capital outpaced code in the ape arcade, and the apes got eaten.
CONTEXT: WHY THIS MATTERS BEYOND ANOTHER RUG PULL
Let me zoom out for a second. Because if you think this is just another meme coin dying, you're missing the forest for the burnt trees.
This event sits at the intersection of several converging narratives. First, the gaming industry's ongoing struggle with data security. Rockstar Games, one of the biggest developers in the world, got breached. That's not a crypto problem. That's a corporate security failure. But crypto turned it into a financial instrument.
Second, the Solana ecosystem's meme coin renaissance. We've seen WIF, BONK, and a parade of dog-themed tokens explode on Solana. The low transaction fees and high throughput make it the perfect playground for speculative micro-cap tokens. But that same accessibility creates a breeding ground for scams. The barrier to entry is so low that anyone can deploy a token in minutes. No audit required. No accountability.
Third, the regulatory environment. Take-Two Interactive has already issued subpoenas. The hackers involved in the GTA 6 breach are being pursued by the FBI and other agencies. Now you have a token that's directly tied to criminal activity. The SEC is watching. The CFTC is watching. And they're all taking notes.
This isn't just a meme coin dying. This is a case study in how event-driven speculation can collide with law enforcement, securities law, and the fundamental question of what a token is actually worth.
Let's talk about the Howey Test for a moment. Because this token fails it so spectacularly that it's almost beautiful. Money invested? Yes. People put SOL into this contract. Common enterprise? Arguably yes, the value depended entirely on the hacker's ability to maintain the GTA 6 narrative. Expectation of profits? Absolutely. Everyone buying CYBERLEEK expected the price to go up. Profits from the efforts of others? The entire value proposition was the hacker's leak and marketing. Four out of four. That's a home run for securities classification.
In plain English: this token is almost certainly an unregistered security. And the person who launched it is almost certainly guilty of securities fraud. Add in the fact that the underlying 'asset' was stolen intellectual property, and you have a legal nightmare wrapped in a token contract.
CORE: THE TECHNICAL AND MARKET POST-MORTEM
Let me get into the weeds here. Because the devil isn't just in the details. The devil is the details.
The Contract Was a Loaded Gun
The CYBERLEEK contract is a standard SPL token with a critical flaw: the owner has administrative privileges that allow for unrestricted token extraction. We saw this in action. The contract owner pulled $146K in Wrapped SOL and 15.4 million tokens as 'fees.' That's not a fee. That's a withdrawal. That's the digital equivalent of the casino owner reaching into the till and walking out the door.
Based on my audit experience, I can tell you that this contract was almost certainly forked from a template or generated using a token creation tool. It wasn't custom-built. It wasn't audited. It had no security review. And it almost certainly contains a backdoor or honeypot mechanism that allows the owner to restrict selling.
Here's the thing about honeypots: they're elegant in their cruelty. You can buy. You can watch your balance go up. But when you try to sell, the transaction fails. The contract checks the seller's address against a blacklist. If you're on the list, you're stuck. Your money is in the contract, but you can't get it out. It's a digital trap with a smiley face on it.
I'm not saying CYBERLEEK was a honeypot. But the owner's ability to extract tokens at will creates the same effect. The moment the owner decides to dump, the price collapses, and everyone else is left holding tokens that are worth fractions of a cent.
The 'innovation' here was purely narrative. The token didn't solve a problem. It didn't provide a service. It didn't have a product. It was a marketing vehicle for a leak that wasn't even the hacker's own work. The 'tech' was a standard SPL token. The 'value' was stolen video game footage. And the 'team' was a criminal.
Tokenomics: The Zero-Sum Game
Let's talk about the token economics. Or rather, the lack thereof.
CYBERLEEK had no revenue. No protocol fees. No yield. No utility. No governance that mattered. The token's value was entirely dependent on market sentiment and the hype cycle around the GTA 6 leak. That's not a tokenomics model. That's a Ponzi structure dressed in digital clothing.
The supply structure was opaque. The hacker controlled the majority of tokens, with the ability to mint more or burn existing ones at will. Early liquidity providers were anonymous. Retail buyers were the exit liquidity. The classic setup.
Here's the math that matters: the $25 million market cap was an illusion. If you tried to sell even a fraction of that in one transaction, you'd hit massive slippage. The actual liquidity available was a fraction of the market cap. The 'value' was a number on a screen. The reality was a puddle of SOL that could be drained in minutes.
The hacker understood this. That's why they extracted early. That's why they converted to SOL quickly. They knew the market cap was fake. They knew the liquidity was shallow. They knew the narrative would collapse. They just needed to be faster than everyone else.
Speed is the only metric that survived the crash. The hacker was fast. The buyers were not.
Market Dynamics: Fear, Loathing, and a Dying Token
From a market perspective, CYBERLEEK went through the full life cycle in less than 48 hours. Launch. FOMO. Peak. Dump. Death. It's a compressed version of what we see with most meme coins, but with a much steeper decline curve.
The price action was brutal. From the high of $0.0344, the token dropped 46% in 24 hours. The market cap shrank from $25 million to $7 million. And that's just the reported number. The actual exit liquidity was likely much worse.
What's interesting is the sentiment shift. In the first few hours, Twitter was on fire. 'GTA 6 on Solana.' 'The leak is now a token.' 'This is the wild west.' The energy was pure FOMO. But once the extraction happened, the sentiment flipped to pure FUD. 'Scam.' 'Rug pull.' 'I told you so.' The social proof inverted, and the price followed.
This is a pattern I've seen repeatedly. The market doesn't care about fundamentals when the narrative is hot. But the moment the narrative breaks, the market overcorrects. It's not a gradual decline. It's a cliff.
The Competitive Landscape
Where does CYBERLEEK sit in the broader meme coin ecosystem? Nowhere. It's a footnote. A cautionary tale. A data point for risk analysts.
Compare it to DOGE, SHIB, or PEPE. Those tokens have massive communities, brand recognition, and in some cases, actual utility. DOGE has been adopted by billionaires. SHIB has its own ecosystem. PEPE has cultural staying power. CYBERLEEK had a leaked trailer and a criminal behind it.
The narrative advantage that CYBERLEEK had - being the 'first GTA 6 token' - was also its death sentence. The narrative was inherently tied to the leak. And the leak was inherently tied to a crime. Once the legal machinery started moving, the narrative was doomed.
This is the fundamental problem with event-driven meme coins. They're not built to last. They're built to spike. And spikes always come down.
CONTRARIAN: THE UNREPORTED ANGLES
Now let me get to the parts that most coverage has missed.
The 'Social Capital Outpaced Code' Phenomenon
The first contrarian angle is the sociology of this event. We talk about 'social capital' in crypto as if it's a technical concept. It's not. It's the accumulated trust, attention, and narrative momentum that a project generates. And in the case of CYBERLEEK, social capital was the entire value proposition.
Think about it. The token had no technical value. The contract was a template. The 'team' was a hacker. The only thing it had was attention. And attention is a hell of a drug.
The market bought into the story. 'The hacker is now a founder.' 'Chaos is the new roadmap.' 'If you can't beat the system, tokenize it.' These were the narratives circulating. And people believed them. Not because they were true, but because they were exciting.
Reading the room while the order book burns - that's what this came down to. The traders who made money on CYBERLEEK weren't the ones who read the whitepaper. They were the ones who read the room. They saw the FOMO building. They saw the narrative peaking. They got in early, rode the wave, and got out before the extraction.
The buyers who lost money? They were the ones who believed the story. They were the ones who thought the narrative would last. They were the ones who confused attention with value.
The Regulatory Blind Spot
The second contrarian angle is the regulatory dimension. Everyone's talking about the rug pull. Almost no one's talking about the securities law implications.
This token is a textbook unregistered security. It passes every prong of the Howey Test. And the person who launched it is almost certainly guilty of securities fraud. But here's the twist: the regulatory response might not be what you expect.
The SEC has been aggressive on crypto. But they've also been selective. They go after big fish. They go after projects that make noise. And CYBERLEEK, despite its $25 million market cap, is small potatoes.
The bigger risk is that this event becomes a template for enforcement. The FBI is already involved because of the GTA 6 hack. Take-Two has issued subpoenas. If the hackers are identified, they'll face criminal charges. And the token launch will be part of the evidence.
This could set a precedent. Event-driven meme coins tied to criminal activity could become a priority for law enforcement. And that would have a chilling effect on the entire meme coin ecosystem.
The Solana Reputation Risk
The third contrarian angle is the impact on Solana. Solana has been fighting the 'Ethereum killer' narrative for years. It's been fighting the 'centralized' narrative. And now it's fighting the 'meme coin casino' narrative.
CYBERLEEK is a black eye for Solana. It shows that anyone can deploy a scam token on the network in minutes. It shows that the ecosystem lacks guardrails. It shows that 'low fees and high throughput' also means 'low barriers to entry for criminals.'
But here's the contrarian take: this might actually be good for Solana in the long run. Adversity forces evolution. The CYBERLEEK incident could push Solana's DEXs and aggregators to implement better token screening. It could push the ecosystem to develop better security tools. It could push the community to be more discerning.
The wild west can't stay wild forever. Eventually, the sheriffs arrive. And the sheriffs make the town safer for everyone.
The 'It's Not About the Money' Fallacy
Here's the fourth contrarian angle, and it's the one that keeps me up at night. The hacker didn't make that much money. $146K. That's not nothing, but it's not a life-changing fortune. Not for someone who hacked one of the biggest gaming companies in the world.
So why did they do it? The money is part of it, sure. But I think it's also about the flex. About proving you can do something no one else has done. About turning a crime into a financial instrument and watching the world react.
This is the psychology of the modern hacker. It's not just about profit. It's about status. About being the one who broke the system and got away with it. About having a story to tell.
And crypto provides the perfect platform for this. You can stay anonymous. You can launch a token in minutes. You can watch the world FOMO into your creation. And then you can pull the rug and disappear.
This isn't a bug in crypto. It's a feature. It's the feature that makes crypto both liberating and terrifying.
The Empathy Gap
Finally, let me talk about the human cost. Behind the charts and the tokenomics and the regulatory analysis, there are real people who lost real money on CYBERLEEK.
Some of them were experienced traders who knew the risks. They made a calculated bet and lost. That's on them.
But some of them were new to crypto. They saw a meme about GTA 6. They thought it was fun. They threw in a few hundred dollars. And they lost it.
I've been through market crashes. I've watched people lose their savings. I've held virtual support sessions during the FTX collapse. I know what this feels like.
The crypto community needs to do better. Not just about policing scams, but about supporting victims. About creating a culture where losing isn't shameful. About reminding people that their worth isn't tied to their portfolio.
Liquidity flows like adrenaline, not like water. And when the adrenaline wears off, you're left with the crash. Be kind to yourself. Be kind to others. And don't bet money you can't afford to lose.
THE DEEPER DIVE: WHAT THE DATA ACTUALLY TELLS US
Let me get even more specific about the data. Because the numbers tell a story that the headlines miss.
On-Chain Analysis: Following the Money
The hacker's wallet activity is a masterclass in execution. They didn't just dump everything at once. That would have crashed the price immediately. Instead, they extracted in stages, managing the exit to maximize their take.
First, they pulled the Wrapped SOL and tokens as 'fees.' This was the initial extraction. Then they converted to SOL and moved it to KuCoin. That's the tell. Moving funds to a centralized exchange is almost always a precursor to selling. It's harder to trace, and it provides a clear exit route.
The timing was also deliberate. The extraction happened while the GTA 6 narrative was still hot. The price hadn't fully collapsed yet. The hacker knew they had a window, and they used it.
This is the kind of behavior that on-chain analytics tools are designed to catch. But most retail traders aren't watching the blockchain. They're watching Twitter. And Twitter was busy pumping the narrative.
The Liquidity Illusion
Let me talk about the $25 million market cap for a second. That number was a lie. Not a malicious lie, but a structural one.
Market cap is calculated by multiplying the token price by the total supply. But the total supply includes tokens held by the hacker that were never meant to be sold. The actual liquid supply - the tokens available for trading - was much smaller.
This creates a massive discrepancy between 'paper value' and 'real value.' You can have a $25 million market cap with only $500K in actual liquidity. And when the hacker starts selling, that liquidity evaporates in seconds.
The lesson here is simple: market cap is not liquidity. Market cap is a measure of the last trade price multiplied by supply. Liquidity is the actual depth of the order book. And in meme coins, liquidity is almost always shallow.
The Velocity of Money
Another data point that gets overlooked is the velocity of money. In the first hours after launch, CYBERLEEK was trading at an insane velocity. Tokens were changing hands every few seconds. The trading volume was enormous relative to the market cap.
This is a classic pump signal. High velocity means high speculation. It means people are buying and selling rapidly, trying to get ahead of each other. It means the token is a hot potato, and everyone's trying to avoid being the one holding it when the music stops.
The music always stops. And when it does, the velocity drops to zero. The token becomes illiquid. The price collapses. And the last holders are left with nothing.
The Whale Concentration Problem
Let me talk about whale concentration. In any meme coin, the distribution of tokens matters. If a few wallets hold the majority of the supply, they have the power to manipulate the price.
CYBERLEEK had extreme whale concentration. The hacker controlled the vast majority of the supply. This meant they could pump the price by simply not selling, and they could dump the price by selling even a small portion.
This isn't a bug. It's a feature of the design. The hacker created a token where they were the whale. They had all the power. And they used it.
For retail traders, this is the worst possible setup. You're playing a game where the house has a loaded deck. The odds are stacked against you from the start.
The Narrative Lifecycle
Finally, let me talk about the narrative lifecycle. Every event-driven meme coin follows a predictable pattern.
Stage one: Launch. The token appears out of nowhere. The narrative is fresh. The FOMO is building.
Stage two: Peak. The token hits its high. Twitter is full of posts. The narrative is at its strongest. Everyone wants in.
Stage three: Extraction. The insiders sell. The price starts to drop. The narrative starts to crack.
Stage four: Death. The price collapses. The narrative is dead. The token is forgotten.
The cycle takes anywhere from hours to days. It's fast. It's brutal. And it's designed that way.
CYBERLEEK went through this entire lifecycle in less than 48 hours. That's faster than most. But the pattern was the same. And the outcome was the same.
THE BIGGER PICTURE: WHAT THIS MEANS FOR CRYPTO
Let me step back and look at the bigger picture. Because CYBERLEEK isn't just a failed token. It's a symptom of a larger problem.
The problem is that crypto has become a casino. Not entirely, of course. There are real projects building real value. But the meme coin sector has turned into a gambling den where the house always wins.
The house isn't a casino. It's the insiders. The developers. The influencers. The hackers. They control the supply. They control the narrative. And they control the exits.
Retail traders are the marks. They're the ones buying at the top. They're the ones holding the bags. They're the ones who lose money so the insiders can profit.
This isn't sustainable. Eventually, the retail traders will wake up. They'll stop buying meme coins. They'll demand better projects. They'll demand accountability.
And when that happens, the meme coin bubble will burst. Not because of regulation. Not because of a specific scandal. But because the fundamental economics don't work for the majority of participants.
The Regulation Question
The CYBERLEEK case raises serious questions about regulation. Should the SEC be involved? Should the CFTC? Should the FBI?
The answer is complicated. On one hand, regulation could protect investors from scams. On the other hand, regulation could stifle innovation.
The key is to find a balance. To create rules that protect consumers without killing the creativity that makes crypto unique.
But here's the thing: regulation is already coming. The GTA 6 hack is a federal crime. The token launch is securities fraud. The combination of the two is a law enforcement dream.
The question isn't whether regulators will get involved. It's when. And when they do, the meme coin ecosystem will feel the impact.
The Institutional Angle
There's another angle that gets overlooked: the institutional impact. Traditional finance is watching crypto. They're looking for reasons to stay out. They're looking for reasons to be skeptical.
CYBERLEEK gives them ammunition. It's a perfect example of everything wrong with crypto. The anonymity. The lack of accountability. The scams. The fraud.
Institutions don't want to touch that. They want regulated markets. They want transparency. They want accountability.
And every time a CYBERLEEK happens, it pushes institutions further away. It reinforces the narrative that crypto is a wild west that can't be trusted.
This is bad for the entire ecosystem. Not just for meme coins. For all of crypto.
The Builder's Perspective
But here's the flip side. The builders in crypto - the ones creating real projects - they're the ones who will benefit from this.
Because CYBERLEEK is a perfect example of what NOT to do. It's a case study in failure. It's a lesson for anyone who thinks launching a token is easy.
Builders can use this as a cautionary tale. They can point to CYBERLEEK and say 'see, this is why we audit our contracts.' They can point to CYBERLEEK and say 'see, this is why we have a real team.' They can point to CYBERLEEK and say 'see, this is why we build actual products.'
The contrast between a scam token and a real project is stark. And the more scams that get exposed, the more the real projects stand out.
THE STRATEGIC PLAYBOOK: WHAT TRADERS SHOULD DO
Now let me get practical. What should traders do with this information? How should you approach the meme coin market after CYBERLEEK?
The 'Don't Buy the Headline' Rule
The first rule is simple: don't buy the headline. When you see a token tied to a breaking news event, assume it's a scam. Assume the insiders are going to dump. Assume you're the exit liquidity.
This isn't always true. Sometimes a token tied to a news event has real value. But the odds are against you. And the risk-reward is terrible.
If you're going to speculate, do it with money you can afford to lose. Treat it like a lottery ticket. Not an investment.
The On-Chain Check
Before you buy any new token, check the chain. Look at the holder distribution. Look at the liquidity. Look at the contract.
Is there a single wallet holding more than 10% of the supply? That's a red flag. Is the liquidity locked? That's a green flag. Has the contract been audited? That's a green flag.
These checks take five minutes. They can save you from losing your entire investment. It's not foolproof, but it filters out the most obvious scams.
The Exit Strategy
If you do buy a meme coin, have an exit strategy. Decide in advance when you're going to sell. And stick to it.
Don't get greedy. Don't hold out for the moon. Take profits when you have them. And don't fall in love with a token that doesn't love you back.
The Psychological Game
Finally, understand the psychological game. Meme coins are designed to trigger your FOMO. They're designed to make you feel like you're missing out.
The truth is, you're not missing out. You're avoiding a trap. The people who 'made money' on CYBERLEEK are the insiders. The people who lost money are the ones who bought the hype.
Be the person who reads the room. Be the person who watches the order book. Be the person who understands that speed is the only metric that survived the crash.
THE FINAL VERDICT: CYBERLEEK AS A MIRROR
Let me bring this home. CYBERLEEK isn't just a failed token. It's a mirror. It reflects the best and worst of crypto.
The best: the speed of innovation. The ability to launch a financial instrument in minutes. The global reach. The borderless nature of the technology.
The worst: the greed. The scams. The lack of accountability. The human cost.
We need to look in this mirror and see ourselves honestly. We need to acknowledge that the meme coin market is broken. We need to acknowledge that retail traders are being exploited. We need to acknowledge that the current system favors insiders over outsiders.
But we also need to remember why we're here. We're here because blockchain technology has the potential to change the world. We're here because decentralized finance can provide access to financial services for the unbanked. We're here because this technology is genuinely revolutionary.
The scams are a side effect. They're the cost of a permissionless system. But they're not the whole story.
The Sprint Continues
The sprint doesn't end when the block confirms. It continues. It continues through the crashes and the scams and the heartbreak. It continues because the builders keep building. Because the believers keep believing. Because the technology keeps improving.
CYBERLEEK will be forgotten. The hacker will be caught or will disappear into the digital ether. The token will go to zero. But the lessons will remain.
Lesson one: social capital outpaced code in the ape arcade, and the apes got eaten. Lesson two: speed is the only metric that survived the crash. Lesson three: reading the room while the order book burns is the only skill that matters in a zero-sum game.
I've been doing this for nine years. I've seen bubbles burst and new ones form. I've seen scams exposed and heroes emerge. And I've learned that the only constant in crypto is change.
So here's my takeaway for you: stay curious. Stay skeptical. Stay humble. Don't chase the hype. Don't believe the narratives. Do your own research. And remember that the market is always trying to take your money.
Arbitrage isn't just about price differences. It's about information asymmetry. It's about knowing something the market doesn't. And in the case of CYBERLEEK, the market knew nothing. The hacker knew everything. And the outcome was inevitable.
The next time you see a token tied to a breaking news event, ask yourself: who's the insider? Who has the information advantage? And are you the mark?
Because in the meme coin casino, the house always wins. And the house is always anonymous.
WATCHING THE SIGNALS: WHAT I'M TRACKING NOW
Let me leave you with some specific signals to watch in the coming weeks.
First, the hacker's wallet. If you can identify the wallet address, watch it on Solscan. Any large transfers to exchanges are a signal that more selling is coming. The 15.4 million tokens that were extracted - they're still out there. If they hit the market, the price will crater again.
Second, the legal proceedings. Take-Two has issued subpoenas. The FBI is investigating. If the hackers are identified, it will be a major news event. And it will have implications for the entire meme coin ecosystem.
Third, the regulatory response. Will the SEC issue a statement? Will the CFTC get involved? Will Congress use this as an example in the ongoing crypto regulation debates? All of these are possibilities.
Fourth, the Solana ecosystem response. Will DEXs implement better token screening? Will the community demand better security practices? Will this incident lead to positive changes?
The answers to these questions will shape the future of meme coins. And they'll provide valuable data for anyone trying to navigate this chaotic, exciting, dangerous space.
A FINAL WORD ON COMMUNITY
Before I go, let me say something that might sound soft in a hard market. Look out for each other.
Crypto can be isolating. You're staring at charts alone at 3 AM. You're watching your portfolio bleed out. You're wondering if you made a terrible mistake.
I've been there. I've organized support groups during the FTX collapse. I've held livestreams where people shared their stories of loss. I've seen the human cost of market crashes.
The market doesn't care about you. The algorithms don't care about you. The influencers don't care about you. But the community can.
If you're struggling, reach out. If you see someone struggling, be kind. Remember that behind every wallet address is a human being. And human beings deserve compassion.
The market will recover. The next bull run will come. But the scars from this bear market will remain. And how we treat each other during the dark times will define who we are as a community.
Stay safe out there. Stay sharp. And remember: the sprint doesn't end when the block confirms. It only ends when you decide to stop running.
I'm still running. I hope you are too.
